Julien Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 Hi there, I'm currently updating a translation, by comparing which new strings were added in definitions.xml as compared to the existing translation. I observed that in definitions.xml, for each group, almost all strings for a major version are sorted alphabetically according to their "name" attribute. Unfortunately, a few recent strings Most strings for new major version 6 were put in definitions.xml at the beginning of the groups. Please sort strings alphabetically according to their name attribute, as this makes easier updating the translations. Edit Should one put strings for new major versions (e.g. 6.x.x) above those of previous major versions ? This is what is prevailing in definitions.xml. Al Brookbanks, in order to make the work of translators easier on the long run, can you please provide guidance: Should strings in definitions.xml and translations be sorted alphabetically by their "name" attribute (regardless of major version), or should they be sorted alphabetically by major version and then alphabetically? It would be good agreeing on a standard. Thanks. Julien Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havenswift-hosting Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 You would be much better adding an "issue" to https://github.com/cubecart/v6/issues Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julien Posted August 2, 2019 Author Share Posted August 2, 2019 Thanks, but I don't have a GitHub account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havenswift-hosting Posted August 2, 2019 Share Posted August 2, 2019 Very easy to create one and it is usually the only way that changes are made to core Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.